That would definitely help. Create a JIRA issue, then post your findings after y'all have tried it out!
- Houston On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 12:35 PM Tomasz Elendt <tomasz.ele...@gmail.com> wrote: > Of that helps I can build a custom image myself, upgrade a few clusters in > my company and report back if there are any issues. > > (Of course our deployment might not necessarily cover all edge cases.) > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023, 18:25 Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Might be a good thing to do for Solr 9.5. > > > > We hit some issues when moving 9.0 to JDK 17, which caused some trouble > > and weren't particularly easy to fix without causing some compatibility > > issues. > > However, we are better equipped now to do quick fixes in the dockerfile > > that don't require a bug-fix release of Solr. > > > > I say +1 and target for 9.5, just making sure the change is represented > in > > the Solr upgrade notes. > > > > - Houston > > > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 12:11 PM Tomasz Elendt <tomasz.ele...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > I noticed that JDK 21 LTS was released some time ago. Is there any > reason > > > why official docker images still use JDK 17? > > > > > > I'm asking because I know there are some preview JDK features that > Lucene > > > utilizes and Solr enables them when it detects a newer version (e.g. > > > SOLR-16500). > > > > > > Does it make sense to switch now that there is a new LTS version? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Tomasz > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > > > > > > > > >
