Since we moved main to min JDK 21 the base images are JDK 21 there for Solr 10. Any movement here on moving to JDK 21 on branch_9x? How has testing gone in the last ~1 yr.
Kevin Risden On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 10:27 AM Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org> wrote: > Those images are available now. > > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/solr-nightly/tags?page=1&name=java21 > > Also I setup the Jenkins jobs to only push the tags if the docker tests > pass, so we at least have that guarantee! > > Hopefully we can get a good amount of testing with these and upgrade when > java 21 is a little bit older. > > - Houston > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 2:50 PM Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I've changed the nightly docker jobs to also create "-java21" images for > > main, branch_9x and branch_9_4, so we can start testing this out before > > making it official. > > > > The new images should become available in the next 24 hours. > > > > e.g. apache/solr-nightly:9.4.1-SNAPSHOT-java21 > > > > - Houston > > > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 12:19 PM Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >> We could also use Java 21 for the 9x and main nightly images! Easy to > >> change it in the Jenkins jobs > >> > >> - Houston > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 6:22 PM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> I agree on being conservative here. But if it turns out to work well, > we > >>> could consider publishing an additional solr:9.4.0-jre21 tag. That way > >>> early adopters have a choice. If I remember correctly, Java 21 has some > >>> improvements that can benefit some vector workloads or something, so I > see > >>> a benefit in getting it out there. We could alternatively opt to push > >>> temporary images like this to our own apache/solr docker namespace for > >>> folks to try out. > >>> > >>> Jan > >>> > >>> > 24. okt. 2023 kl. 18:17 skrev Shawn Heisey > <apa...@elyograg.org.INVALID > >>> >: > >>> > > >>> > On 10/18/2023 10:11 AM, Tomasz Elendt wrote: > >>> >> I noticed that JDK 21 LTS was released some time ago. Is there any > >>> reason why official docker images still use JDK 17? > >>> >> I'm asking because I know there are some preview JDK features that > >>> Lucene utilizes and Solr enables them when it detects a newer version > (e.g. > >>> SOLR-16500). > >>> >> Does it make sense to switch now that there is a new LTS version? > >>> > > >>> > I have no desire to stand in the way of progress, but Java 21 has > only > >>> been out for a month. I don't think it's a good idea to rely on a new > >>> major version of *anything* that soon after its release. Test with > it, but > >>> don't switch to it. > >>> > > >>> > I do not think we should be planning on such a major upgrade to the > >>> docker image until Java 21 has been out for a while. I was going to > >>> upgrade my Solr server to Java 21 to try it out since it's not a > mission > >>> critical install, but Ubuntu doesn't yet have OpenJDK packages for it. > The > >>> eclipse-temurin:21-jre-jammy docker image was pushed 11 days ago. > >>> > > >>> > My thought on it is to wait until at least the release of Java 22, > >>> which will happen six months after Java 21 was released. > >>> > > >>> > Thanks, > >>> > Shawn > >>> > > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >>> > >>> >
