Jason, I tackled SOLR-17068 (the one you reminded me of) and I’d love to get it 
into 9.5 since right now we have a terrible mish mash of bin/solr post and 
bin/post in the ref guide and docs.

Could someone review https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2227 and if it looks 
good could we sneak it into 9.5?   

Eric


> On Jan 26, 2024, at 6:29 PM, Eric Pugh <ep...@opensourceconnections.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Backport to branch_9_5 is done.
> 
> 
>> On Jan 26, 2024, at 1:11 PM, Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Go ahead and backport on your own!  I'm still waiting on Lucene 9.9.2, so
>> there shouldn't be any branch-contention on my end.
>> 
>> Relatedly, Lucene has their RC1 out there and things look good a day or two
>> into their VOTE, so with any luck we'll be able to get a Solr 9.5 RC
>> together early next week!
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Jason
>> 
>> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 8:49 AM Eric Pugh <ep...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> I am about to merge SOLR-17112, and will backport it to branch_9x.  Jason,
>>> do you backport it over to the branch_9_5 or do I?
>>> 
>>> ERic
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 2024/01/23 19:08:10 Jason Gerlowski wrote:
>>>>> It was hoped SOLR-17112 would make 9.4.1 but it didn't as no PR was
>>>> proposed.
>>>> 
>>>>> SOLR-17120 [is] nominated for inclusion in the 9.5.0 release
>>>> 
>>>> Those both sound quick and reasonable; they've got a +1 from me to go
>>> into
>>>> 9.5 (assuming the contributor decides to continue with SOLR-17112).
>>>> 
>>>>> Considering Lucene 9.9.2 is being planned, I think it would be better
>>> to
>>>>> upgrade Solr to the to-be-released version so users have to deal with
>>>>> fewer upgrade cycles.
>>>> 
>>>> Yeah, that might be best; I hadn't realized we weren't already on the
>>>> latest Lucene 9.x.  I've created SOLR-17128 to track our Lucene upgrade
>>>> once 9.9.2 is available.
>>>> 
>>>> Obviously this is a longer delay than some of the tickets above, and will
>>>> mean we won't be cutting a Solr RC this week.  We can pick a new date for
>>>> the initial Solr 9.5 RC once Lucene 9.9.2 is available.
>>>> 
>>>> Best,
>>>> 
>>>> Jason
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 1:37 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Considering Lucene 9.9.2 is being planned, I think it would be better
>>> to
>>>>> upgrade Solr to the to-be-released version so users have to deal with
>>> fewer
>>>>> upgrade cycles.
>>>>> 
>>>>> To highlight, there are about 90 odd changes in the Lucene 9.9.x line.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Anshum
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 8:47 AM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> FYI It was hoped SOLR-17112
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17112 "bin/solr script
>>>>>> doesn't do ps properly on some systems" would make 9.4.1 but it
>>> didn't
>>>>>> as no PR was proposed.  There still isn't one but a contributor is
>>>>>> thinking about it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 11:30 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/
>>>>>> LONDON) <cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Just to cross-reference things further (Jason is already aware) --
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17120 and
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2214 are nominated for
>>> inclusion in
>>>>>> the 9.5 release, and as always additional reviews and inputs are
>>> welcome.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Christine
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/22/24 17:30:35 UTCTo:
>>>>>> dev@solr.apache.org
>>>>>>> Subject: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.5.0
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> NOTICE:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Branch branch_9_5 has been cut and versions updated to 9.6 on the
>>>>> stable
>>>>>>> branch.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Please observe the normal rules:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> * No new features may be committed to the branch.
>>>>>>> * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes may be
>>>>>>>  committed to the branch. However, you should submit all patches
>>> you
>>>>>>>  want to commit to Jira first to give others the chance to review
>>>>>>>  and possibly vote against the patch. Keep in mind that it is our
>>>>>>>  main intention to keep the branch as stable as possible.
>>>>>>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be
>>>>> committed
>>>>>>>  to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then
>>> into
>>>>>>>  the current release branch.
>>>>>>> * Normal unstable and stable branch development may continue as
>>> usual.
>>>>>>>  However, if you plan to commit a big change to the unstable
>>> branch
>>>>>>>  while the branch feature freeze is in effect, think twice: can't
>>> the
>>>>>>>  addition wait a couple more days? Merges of bug fixes into the
>>> branch
>>>>>>>  may become more difficult.
>>>>>>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 9.5 and priority "Blocker" will
>>>>> delay
>>>>>>>  a release candidate build.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The feature-freeze for the 9.5 release will go till the end of this
>>>>> week
>>>>>> -
>>>>>>> I'll aim to create our first RC on Thursday, January 25th.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Jason
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> _______________________
> Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | 
> http://www.opensourceconnections.com <http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> 
> | My Free/Busy <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>  
> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed 
> <https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw>
>   
> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be 
> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of 
> whether attachments are marked as such.
> 

_______________________
Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | 
http://www.opensourceconnections.com <http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | 
My Free/Busy <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>  
Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed 
<https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw>
    
This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be 
Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of whether 
attachments are marked as such.

Reply via email to