I'm working on the Lucene upgrade now. That will still need some time in review (and maybe a day to let tests bake?), so I'm fine if you backport SOLR-17068 in that timeframe. But let's draw the line once the Lucene 9.9.2 upgrade is in, unless something else urgent comes up. I'll target Wednesday or Thursday for the Solr RC1.
Jason On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 4:15 PM Eric Pugh <ep...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote: > Jason, I tackled SOLR-17068 (the one you reminded me of) and I’d love to > get it into 9.5 since right now we have a terrible mish mash of bin/solr > post and bin/post in the ref guide and docs. > > Could someone review https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2227 and if it > looks good could we sneak it into 9.5? > > Eric > > > > On Jan 26, 2024, at 6:29 PM, Eric Pugh <ep...@opensourceconnections.com> > wrote: > > > > Backport to branch_9_5 is done. > > > > > >> On Jan 26, 2024, at 1:11 PM, Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Go ahead and backport on your own! I'm still waiting on Lucene 9.9.2, > so > >> there shouldn't be any branch-contention on my end. > >> > >> Relatedly, Lucene has their RC1 out there and things look good a day or > two > >> into their VOTE, so with any luck we'll be able to get a Solr 9.5 RC > >> together early next week! > >> > >> Best, > >> > >> Jason > >> > >> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 8:49 AM Eric Pugh <ep...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >>> I am about to merge SOLR-17112, and will backport it to branch_9x. > Jason, > >>> do you backport it over to the branch_9_5 or do I? > >>> > >>> ERic > >>> > >>> > >>> On 2024/01/23 19:08:10 Jason Gerlowski wrote: > >>>>> It was hoped SOLR-17112 would make 9.4.1 but it didn't as no PR was > >>>> proposed. > >>>> > >>>>> SOLR-17120 [is] nominated for inclusion in the 9.5.0 release > >>>> > >>>> Those both sound quick and reasonable; they've got a +1 from me to go > >>> into > >>>> 9.5 (assuming the contributor decides to continue with SOLR-17112). > >>>> > >>>>> Considering Lucene 9.9.2 is being planned, I think it would be better > >>> to > >>>>> upgrade Solr to the to-be-released version so users have to deal with > >>>>> fewer upgrade cycles. > >>>> > >>>> Yeah, that might be best; I hadn't realized we weren't already on the > >>>> latest Lucene 9.x. I've created SOLR-17128 to track our Lucene > upgrade > >>>> once 9.9.2 is available. > >>>> > >>>> Obviously this is a longer delay than some of the tickets above, and > will > >>>> mean we won't be cutting a Solr RC this week. We can pick a new date > for > >>>> the initial Solr 9.5 RC once Lucene 9.9.2 is available. > >>>> > >>>> Best, > >>>> > >>>> Jason > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 1:37 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Considering Lucene 9.9.2 is being planned, I think it would be better > >>> to > >>>>> upgrade Solr to the to-be-released version so users have to deal with > >>> fewer > >>>>> upgrade cycles. > >>>>> > >>>>> To highlight, there are about 90 odd changes in the Lucene 9.9.x > line. > >>>>> > >>>>> -Anshum > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 8:47 AM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> > >>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> FYI It was hoped SOLR-17112 > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17112 "bin/solr script > >>>>>> doesn't do ps properly on some systems" would make 9.4.1 but it > >>> didn't > >>>>>> as no PR was proposed. There still isn't one but a contributor is > >>>>>> thinking about it. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 11:30 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ > >>>>>> LONDON) <cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Just to cross-reference things further (Jason is already aware) -- > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17120 and > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2214 are nominated for > >>> inclusion in > >>>>>> the 9.5 release, and as always additional reviews and inputs are > >>> welcome. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>> Christine > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/22/24 17:30:35 UTCTo: > >>>>>> dev@solr.apache.org > >>>>>>> Subject: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.5.0 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> NOTICE: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Branch branch_9_5 has been cut and versions updated to 9.6 on the > >>>>> stable > >>>>>>> branch. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Please observe the normal rules: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> * No new features may be committed to the branch. > >>>>>>> * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes may be > >>>>>>> committed to the branch. However, you should submit all patches > >>> you > >>>>>>> want to commit to Jira first to give others the chance to review > >>>>>>> and possibly vote against the patch. Keep in mind that it is our > >>>>>>> main intention to keep the branch as stable as possible. > >>>>>>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be > >>>>> committed > >>>>>>> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then > >>> into > >>>>>>> the current release branch. > >>>>>>> * Normal unstable and stable branch development may continue as > >>> usual. > >>>>>>> However, if you plan to commit a big change to the unstable > >>> branch > >>>>>>> while the branch feature freeze is in effect, think twice: can't > >>> the > >>>>>>> addition wait a couple more days? Merges of bug fixes into the > >>> branch > >>>>>>> may become more difficult. > >>>>>>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 9.5 and priority "Blocker" will > >>>>> delay > >>>>>>> a release candidate build. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The feature-freeze for the 9.5 release will go till the end of this > >>>>> week > >>>>>> - > >>>>>>> I'll aim to create our first RC on Thursday, January 25th. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Jason > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Anshum Gupta > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >>> > >>> > > > > _______________________ > > Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | > http://www.opensourceconnections.com < > http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy < > http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> > > Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed < > https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw> > > > This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be > Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of > whether attachments are marked as such. > > > > _______________________ > Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | > http://www.opensourceconnections.com < > http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy < > http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> > Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed < > https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw> > > This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be > Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of > whether attachments are marked as such. > >
