I had earlier asked to wait to get both https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2593 and https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2577 into 9.7.
2577 is in, and Jenkins for main and branch_9x seem to have passed (the failures are on the prometheus tests)…. 2577 fixes a lot of documentation and user messages and I think is important for 9.7. 2593 needs more work, and is all “behind the scenes” changes, so if it ends up in 9.8 that is okay. Eric > On Aug 3, 2024, at 12:59 AM, David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote: > > The release branch has not yet been cut. Anshum, based on your > comments, I think you should cut it. I would like to merge things to > branch_9x without it going to 9.7 as I would like more bake time on > some things. > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 3:09 PM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> For https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17298 >> >> I think the key thing that remains is to verify if the exclusion of >> graph/join/rerank queries really is correct. The tests didn't fail out of >> the box when I removed that restriction, but I want to add some tests that >> explicitly turn it on to be sure. >> >> -Gus >> >> On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 2:50 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote: >> >>> Do we have an estimate on when the open issues will get wrapped up? I >>> certainly would recommend that we don't rush with releasing code and >>> instead let it bake. If it's almost done, I can create the branch early >>> next week and wait a couple of days before moving forward with the release. >>> >>> There's no rush, but I wouldn't want to be blocked indefinitely. >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 1:14 PM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> For the Prometheus test failures, I re-opened the issue. Consider >>>> that one just test noise; we should ignore it if it doesn't get fixed >>>> soon. >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17368 >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 8:34 AM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Also looking at >>>> http://fucit.org/solr-jenkins-reports/failure-report.html >>>>> we have a couple tests with high fail rates. This one seems to be >>>>> reproducible (reliably with seed, but also not hard to generate >>> without) >>>>> >>>>> org.apache.solr.cloud.DistribDocExpirationUpdateProcessorTest > >>>> testNoAuth >>>>> FAILED >>>>> java.lang.AssertionError: Give up waiting for no results: >>>>> >>>> >>> q=should_expire_s:yup&rows=0&_trace=init_batch_check&_stateVer_=expiring:13 >>>>> expected:<0> but was:<55> >>>>> at >>>>> >>> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([11EF0AA307058EA1:CD5AB0CEBDD35C89]:0) >>>>> >>>>> 2> 563294 ERROR (qtp1873537458-54511-null-134677) [n:127.0.0.1:34489 >>>> _solr >>>>> c:expiring_secure s:shard2 r:core_node7 >>>> x:expiring_secure_shard2_replica_n3 >>>>> t:null-134677] o.a.s.h.RequestHandlerBase Client exception >>>>> 2> => org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: can not use >>>>> FieldCache on a field w/o docValues unless it is indexed >>>> uninvertible=true >>>>> and the type supports Uninversion: _version_ >>>>> 2> at >>>>> >>>> >>> org.apache.solr.schema.SchemaField.checkFieldCacheSource(SchemaField.java:295) >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 7:22 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) >>> < >>>>> cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> If there is time I'd like to nominate >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17386 and >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2607 to be in the 9.7 release. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Christine >>>>>> >>>>>> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 07/29/24 15:50:24 UTC+1:00To: >>>>>> dev@solr.apache.org >>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.7 release >>>>>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17298 is more or less >>>> ready, >>>>>> but >>>>>> would like it to at least have a few days sitting in main before I >>>> backport >>>>>> it. Without it the multi-threaded search needs to be documented as >>> not >>>>>> working with cpuTimeAllowed. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 12:31 PM Anshum Gupta < >>> ans...@anshumgupta.net> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Sure, I'll wait until the 30th. Thanks for letting me know. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 9:39 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>>>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Anshum, >>>>>>>> I'm still working on unblocking SOLR-13350. Can we please push >>> the >>>> date >>>>>>>> back by a week, say 30 July? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks and regards, >>>>>>>> Ishan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Jul, 2024, 10:52 pm Anshum Gupta, < >>>> ans...@anshumgupta.net> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As there are still a few dependency upgrade PRs open, I'll give >>>> it a >>>>>>> few >>>>>>>>> days and try and help review + merge those in before starting >>> the >>>>>>> process >>>>>>>>> later this week. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 10:04 AM Eric Pugh < >>>>>>>>> ep...@opensourceconnections.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I would like to see the back port of solr cli changes make >>> it… >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2540 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks to some great work from Jan I suspect it can be >>>> committed >>>>>> this >>>>>>>>> week. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 6:55 PM David Smiley < >>>> dsmi...@apache.org> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> There is at least one blocker, a notable one: >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13350 (search >>>>>> segments >>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>> parallel) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 4:12 PM Anshum Gupta < >>>> ans...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The Change log for Solr 9.7 looks pretty good already >>> with >>>> the >>>>>>>> Lucene >>>>>>>>>>>> upgrade and a bunch of other fixes, improvements, and >>>> features. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to start the release process next *Tuesday, July >>>> 23 >>>>>>>> *unless >>>>>>>>>>> there >>>>>>>>>>>> are objections or reasons to wait. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -Anshum >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Anshum Gupta >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Anshum Gupta >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>>>> https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>>> https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book) >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Anshum Gupta >>> >> >> >> -- >> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >> https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book) > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > _______________________ Eric Pugh | Founder | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | http://www.opensourceconnections.com <http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of whether attachments are marked as such.
