Thanks for the update, Erik.

David - I didn’t intend to suggest a feature freeze but wanted to check if
there was something that must make it into 9.7 based on what everyone was
working on.

I’ll cut a branch on by Monday unless there’s a reason for us to wait.


Anshum Gupta


On Sat, Aug 3, 2024 at 10:27 David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote:

> Eric, merge away; no need to ask permission.  Without a release branch
> (there *still* isn't one), it's not reasonable for the RM to begin a
> feature freeze as was kind of hinted at.  It's still open season!
>
> On Sat, Aug 3, 2024 at 7:54 AM Eric Pugh
> <ep...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> >
> > I had earlier asked to wait to get both
> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2593 and
> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2577 into 9.7.
> >
> > 2577 is in, and Jenkins for main and branch_9x seem to have passed (the
> failures are on the prometheus tests)….   2577 fixes a lot of documentation
> and user messages and I think is important for 9.7.
> >
> > 2593 needs more work, and is all “behind the scenes” changes, so if it
> ends up in 9.8 that is okay.
> >
> > Eric
> >
> >
> > > On Aug 3, 2024, at 12:59 AM, David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > The release branch has not yet been cut.  Anshum, based on your
> > > comments, I think you should cut it.  I would like to merge things to
> > > branch_9x without it going to 9.7 as I would like more bake time on
> > > some things.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 3:09 PM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> For https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17298
> > >>
> > >> I think the key thing that remains is to verify if the exclusion of
> > >> graph/join/rerank queries really is correct. The tests didn't fail
> out of
> > >> the box when I removed that restriction, but I want to add some tests
> that
> > >> explicitly turn it on to be sure.
> > >>
> > >> -Gus
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 2:50 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Do we have an estimate on when the open issues will get wrapped up? I
> > >>> certainly would recommend that we don't rush with releasing code and
> > >>> instead let it bake. If it's almost done, I can create the branch
> early
> > >>> next week and wait a couple of days before moving forward with the
> release.
> > >>>
> > >>> There's no rush, but I wouldn't want to be blocked indefinitely.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 1:14 PM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> For the Prometheus test failures, I re-opened the issue.  Consider
> > >>>> that one just test noise; we should ignore it if it doesn't get
> fixed
> > >>>> soon.
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17368
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 8:34 AM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Also looking at
> > >>>> http://fucit.org/solr-jenkins-reports/failure-report.html
> > >>>>> we have a couple tests with high fail rates. This one seems to be
> > >>>>> reproducible (reliably with seed, but also not hard to generate
> > >>> without)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> org.apache.solr.cloud.DistribDocExpirationUpdateProcessorTest >
> > >>>> testNoAuth
> > >>>>> FAILED
> > >>>>>    java.lang.AssertionError: Give up waiting for no results:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> q=should_expire_s:yup&rows=0&_trace=init_batch_check&_stateVer_=expiring:13
> > >>>>> expected:<0> but was:<55>
> > >>>>>        at
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([11EF0AA307058EA1:CD5AB0CEBDD35C89]:0)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>  2> 563294 ERROR (qtp1873537458-54511-null-134677) [n:
> 127.0.0.1:34489
> > >>>> _solr
> > >>>>> c:expiring_secure s:shard2 r:core_node7
> > >>>> x:expiring_secure_shard2_replica_n3
> > >>>>> t:null-134677] o.a.s.h.RequestHandlerBase Client exception
> > >>>>>  2>           => org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: can not use
> > >>>>> FieldCache on a field w/o docValues unless it is indexed
> > >>>> uninvertible=true
> > >>>>> and the type supports Uninversion: _version_
> > >>>>>  2> at
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> org.apache.solr.schema.SchemaField.checkFieldCacheSource(SchemaField.java:295)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 7:22 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/
> LONDON)
> > >>> <
> > >>>>> cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> If there is time I'd like to nominate
> > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17386 and
> > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2607 to be in the 9.7
> release.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> -Christine
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 07/29/24 15:50:24 UTC+1:00To:
> > >>>>>> dev@solr.apache.org
> > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.7 release
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17298 is more or less
> > >>>> ready,
> > >>>>>> but
> > >>>>>> would like it to at least have a few days sitting in main before I
> > >>>> backport
> > >>>>>> it. Without it the multi-threaded search needs to be documented as
> > >>> not
> > >>>>>> working with cpuTimeAllowed.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 12:31 PM Anshum Gupta <
> > >>> ans...@anshumgupta.net>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Sure, I'll wait until the 30th. Thanks for letting me know.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 9:39 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> > >>>>>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Hi Anshum,
> > >>>>>>>> I'm still working on unblocking SOLR-13350. Can we please push
> > >>> the
> > >>>> date
> > >>>>>>>> back by a week, say 30 July?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Thanks and regards,
> > >>>>>>>> Ishan
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Jul, 2024, 10:52 pm Anshum Gupta, <
> > >>>> ans...@anshumgupta.net>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> As there are still a few dependency upgrade PRs open, I'll give
> > >>>> it a
> > >>>>>>> few
> > >>>>>>>>> days and try and help review + merge those in before starting
> > >>> the
> > >>>>>>> process
> > >>>>>>>>> later this week.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 10:04 AM Eric Pugh <
> > >>>>>>>>> ep...@opensourceconnections.com>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I would like to see the back port of solr cli changes make
> > >>> it…
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2540
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks to some great work from Jan I suspect it can be
> > >>>> committed
> > >>>>>> this
> > >>>>>>>>> week.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 6:55 PM David Smiley <
> > >>>> dsmi...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> There is at least one blocker, a notable one:
> > >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13350 (search
> > >>>>>> segments
> > >>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>> parallel)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 4:12 PM Anshum Gupta <
> > >>>> ans...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> The Change log for Solr 9.7 looks pretty good already
> > >>> with
> > >>>> the
> > >>>>>>>> Lucene
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> upgrade and a bunch of other fixes, improvements, and
> > >>>> features.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to start the release process next *Tuesday, July
> > >>>> 23
> > >>>>>>>> *unless
> > >>>>>>>>>>> there
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> are objections or reasons to wait.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> -Anshum
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>> Anshum Gupta
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>> Anshum Gupta
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
> > >>>>>> https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
> > >>>>> https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book)
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Anshum Gupta
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
> > >> https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book)
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> > >
> >
> > _______________________
> > Eric Pugh | Founder | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 |
> http://www.opensourceconnections.com <
> http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <
> http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
> > Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <
> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw
> >
> > This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of
> whether attachments are marked as such.
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to