Alright, not hearing any objections so I'll proceed with a 0.9.1 release! The usual spiel/reminder about our release branch conventions:
I am now preparing for a Solr Operator bugfix release from branch release-0.9 Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch: * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and discuss why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take. * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with Milestone v0.9.1 in Github, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as Blocker * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into the current release branch. * Only Github issues with Milestone v0.9.1 and priority "Blocker" will delay a release candidate build. Best, Jason On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 11:27 AM Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org> wrote: > > Yes absolutely! > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 10:11 AM Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > We've had a handful of GH Issues come in for the operator (most > > clustered around the SOLR-17690 regression), that are pretty big > > problems for folks hoping to adopt Operator 0.9.0. What do we think > > about doing a bugfix operator release in the next week or two? > > > > Pending any objections - is anyone actively working on a bugfix they'd > > like to get into an 0.9.1 release? > > > > Best, > > > > Jason > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
