I'm adding https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/761 as a blocker, but there is an easy fix! https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/pull/766
- Houston On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 10:43 AM Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com> wrote: > In terms of outstanding blockers I'd like to get a fix in place for > https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/759 before we build an > RC. It looks like a small syntax error in the bash script run by our > 'setup-zk' container. Hoping I can have a fix in the next day or so. > > I'm tempted to list https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/760 > as a blocker as well, but I did some testing yesterday and struggled > to reproduce the reported issue. If the reporter provides additional > context+details soon, I might move to include it. But otherwise we > probably don't want to hold the release on a response that might never > come... > > Best, > > Jason > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 11:38 AM Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Alright, not hearing any objections so I'll proceed with a 0.9.1 release! > > > > The usual spiel/reminder about our release branch conventions: > > > > I am now preparing for a Solr Operator bugfix release from branch > release-0.9 > > > > Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch: > > > > * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and discuss > > why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take. > > * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with Milestone > v0.9.1 > > in Github, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as > Blocker > > * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed > > to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into > > the current release branch. > > * Only Github issues with Milestone v0.9.1 and priority "Blocker" will > delay > > a release candidate build. > > > > Best, > > > > Jason > > > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 11:27 AM Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > Yes absolutely! > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 10:11 AM Jason Gerlowski < > gerlowsk...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > We've had a handful of GH Issues come in for the operator (most > > > > clustered around the SOLR-17690 regression), that are pretty big > > > > problems for folks hoping to adopt Operator 0.9.0. What do we think > > > > about doing a bugfix operator release in the next week or two? > > > > > > > > Pending any objections - is anyone actively working on a bugfix > they'd > > > > like to get into an 0.9.1 release? > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > Jason > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >
