Hello Team +1 non binding SUCCESS! [0:46:03.054689]
Kind Regards Alejandro Arrieta On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 5:48 PM Andrey Ukhanov (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD A) < [email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > SUCCESS! [0:56:27.055985] > > From: [email protected] At: 01/16/26 13:05:40 UTC-5:00To: > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.0.0 RC2 > > +1 (binding) > > I ran the smoketester, did some real basic tire-kicking of the docker > image in the operator, and did backup/restore in a tiny collection. > > Jason > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 2:33 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Yea, the respin loop must handle this, not just regenerate but also new > files > in unreleased folder and re-generate Changes.html > > > > Jan Høydahl > > > > > 16. jan. 2026 kl. 03:26 skrev Jason Gerlowski <[email protected]>: > > > > > > It seems like one missing piece is that the releaseWizard should > > > re-generate CHANGELOG.md each time the RM prepares a new release > > > candidate? Looking at the "changelog/" directory tree on branch_10_0 > > > at least, all of the individual files look as I'd expect: there's no > > > duplication between 9.10.1, etc. The problem seems to be that > > > CHANGELOG.md was generated "too early" in the process. > > > > > > Jason > > > > > >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 6:55 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Oh no. We need to figure out how to handle parallel releases in this > case > > >> as 9.10.1 release will most likely happen before 10.0. > > >> I'd like to continue running this vote and testing until after the > 9.10.1 > > >> release, and then if the changelog is the only issue we can fix it, > spin > > >> another RC and release in 72 hours. > > >> > > >>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 3:29 PM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> First thing I notice is that the generated changelog is wrong, both > the > > >>> CHANGELOG.md file inside the tarballs and the Changes.html. They both > > >>> contain the changes from the not-yet-released 9.10.1, and with a > wrong > > >>> release date > > >>> > > >>> [9.10.1] - 2026-01-08 > > >>> > > >>> So I think that either we release 10.0.0 first, without mentioning > 9.10.1 > > >>> or we wait until 9.10.1 is out the door before the next 10.0.0 RC. > > >>> > > >>> Jan > > >>> > > >>>> 15. jan. 2026 kl. 20:53 skrev Anshum Gupta <[email protected]>: > > >>>> > > >>>> Hi everyone, > > >>>> > > >>>> Please vote for Release Candidate 2 for Solr 10.0.0 > > >>>> > > >>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > >>>> > > >>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC2-rev-4c0f36427e2a5ef0 > a468252f6c3bd863c956aa0c > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC2-rev-4c0f36427e2a5ef0a468252f6c3bd863c956aa0c> > > >>>> > > >>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > >>>> > > >>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > >>>> > > >>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC2-rev-4c0f36427e2a5ef0 > a468252f6c3bd863c956aa0c > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC2-rev-4c0f36427e2a5ef0a468252f6c3bd863c956aa0c> > > >>>> > > >>>> You can build a release-candidate of the official docker images > (full & > > >>>> slim) using the following command: > > >>>> > > >>>> SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER= > > >>>> > > >>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC2-rev-4c0f36427e2a5ef0 > a468252f6c3bd863c956aa0c/solr > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-10.0.0-RC2-rev-4c0f36427e2a5ef0a468252f6c3bd863c956aa0c/solr> > > >>>> && \ > > >>>> docker build > > >>> $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/10.0.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-full > > >>>> \ > > >>>> --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \ > > >>>> -t solr-rc:10.0.0-2 && \ > > >>>> docker build > > >>> $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/10.0.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-slim > > >>>> \ > > >>>> --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \ > > >>>> -t solr-rc:10.0.0-2-slim > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> *The vote will be open for at least 7 days i.e. until 2026-01-22 > 20:00 > > >>> UTC.* > > >>>> [ ] +1 approve > > >>>> [ ] +0 no opinion > > >>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > >>>> > > >>>> Here is my +1 > > >>>> SUCCESS! [0:53:37.211799] > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Anshum Gupta > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Anshum Gupta > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >
