On 2026/10/26 05:01:44 Jalaz Kumar wrote:
> Yes correct, that’s what Jan fixed in the yaml file.
>
> For now, including draft PRs under this check is not yet deployed from ASF
> infra team, that’s why the parsing of yaml file was broken earlier.
>
> Jan removed that problematic key, post which it’s working partially now,
> including drafts counts also in check will be kind of follow up now in
> future once its sorted out on infra side.
>
>
> Regards
> Jalaz Kumar
>
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2026 at 10:10 AM, Nick Boss <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > The change prevents me from marking Drafts as Open but doesn't prevent me
> > from opening a Draft.
> > Opening a PR returns 404 unless it's marked Draft.
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2026 at 8:03 PM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > There was an error parsing our asf.yaml, fixed, please try again...
> > >
> > > Jan
> > >
> > > > 24. okt. 2026 kl. 23:42 skrev Jalaz Kumar <[email protected]>:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Jan
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for adding this cap, I can see that the PR is merged now. But I
> > > > don't think it's taking effect.
> > > > Out of curiosity, I tested this after the merge and I was able to open
> > 7+
> > > > PRs since then without any block/warning.
> > > >
> > > > All 8 are still open, plus an older one. so, 9 are open in total. The
> > cap
> > > > should have been at 7.
> > > >
> > > > Is there something more needed at ASF-Infra side for this to take
> > effect,
> > > > or I may be missing something?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2026 at 8:14 PM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/5163
> > > >>
> > > >>> 16. okt. 2026 kl. 16:31 skrev Jan Høydahl <[email protected]>:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hi,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> So far only positive feedback. Here's the PR, I'll merge on Monday...
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Jan
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> 15. okt. 2026 kl. 17:20 skrev Jan Høydahl <[email protected]>:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Hello,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> The Apache Infrastructure team has recently introduced a
> > configuration
> > > >> option that allows projects to set a maximum limit on concurrent pull
> > > >> requests from external contributors—those without write access—while
> > > >> exempting committers. Details are available at
> > > >>
> > >
> > https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml#pull-request-creation-cap
> > > >> .
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I propose implementing a cap across all Solr repositories. This
> > > >> adjustment would better align with our review capacity and encourage
> > > >> contributors to prioritize existing submissions.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I suggest a threshold of seven as an initial estimate. A potential
> > > risk
> > > >> is that contributors might submit larger pull requests to maximize the
> > > >> limit, which could reduce reviewability; however, we can address this
> > > >> through feedback.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> This message is not a formal vote, and I do not anticipate one. If
> > the
> > > >> discussion lacks consensus, becomes contentious, or encounters
> > > significant
> > > >> resistance, we may initiate a vote to resolve the matter.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Jan
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards
> > > > Jalaz Kumar
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >
> > >
> >
>
So, one side effect... We have a draft pr
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/5230 but I can't merge it..
I know we want to push things over the finish line, and I know Nick is an
outlier a bit, but 7 may be too low.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
