Yes, works like a charm now. Author has reached the open pull request limit is what I see now, when trying to move draft to Review.
Thanks Jan. is is On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 5:33 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> wrote: > There was an error parsing our asf.yaml, fixed, please try again... > > Jan > > > 24. okt. 2026 kl. 23:42 skrev Jalaz Kumar <[email protected]>: > > > > Hi Jan > > > > Thanks for adding this cap, I can see that the PR is merged now. But I > > don't think it's taking effect. > > Out of curiosity, I tested this after the merge and I was able to open 7+ > > PRs since then without any block/warning. > > > > All 8 are still open, plus an older one. so, 9 are open in total. The cap > > should have been at 7. > > > > Is there something more needed at ASF-Infra side for this to take effect, > > or I may be missing something? > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2026 at 8:14 PM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/5163 > >> > >>> 16. okt. 2026 kl. 16:31 skrev Jan Høydahl <[email protected]>: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> So far only positive feedback. Here's the PR, I'll merge on Monday... > >>> > >>> Jan > >>> > >>>> 15. okt. 2026 kl. 17:20 skrev Jan Høydahl <[email protected]>: > >>>> > >>>> Hello, > >>>> > >>>> The Apache Infrastructure team has recently introduced a configuration > >> option that allows projects to set a maximum limit on concurrent pull > >> requests from external contributors—those without write access—while > >> exempting committers. Details are available at > >> > https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml#pull-request-creation-cap > >> . > >>>> > >>>> I propose implementing a cap across all Solr repositories. This > >> adjustment would better align with our review capacity and encourage > >> contributors to prioritize existing submissions. > >>>> > >>>> I suggest a threshold of seven as an initial estimate. A potential > risk > >> is that contributors might submit larger pull requests to maximize the > >> limit, which could reduce reviewability; however, we can address this > >> through feedback. > >>>> > >>>> This message is not a formal vote, and I do not anticipate one. If the > >> discussion lacks consensus, becomes contentious, or encounters > significant > >> resistance, we may initiate a vote to resolve the matter. > >>>> > >>>> Jan > >>> > >> > >> > > > > -- > > Regards > > Jalaz Kumar > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Regards Jalaz Kumar
