Theo Van Dinter wrote: > Sorry to be a killjoy here. I have no problem with the criticism, but I think I've hit the end of what I'm going to do on this one now that it's working without breaking anything. I'm running out of time for some schoolwork that's due in a month and will have to concentrate on that.
The changes you are talking about are about cleaner design, and I'm +1 for that. And now is a good time to do it, while the issues are fresh, so that it doesn't become some awkward design embedded in old code. But I won't be making those changes. We're still in CTR mode in 3.1, right? I was acting like it was RTC on this one because it felt right to get feedback first when it looked like it would require some changes to the object design, but I don't think it needs a lot of discussion for the last cleanup, so go to it. -- sidney
