http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3821
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|BAYES_99 has lower score |scores are overoptimized for
|than BAYES_95 ?!?!? |training set
Target Milestone|Future |3.1.0
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-25 13:09 -------
Changing summary, the problem is that harder to defeat tests should have
higher weights than easy-to-defeat ones.
Harder to defeat:
- learning tests (local control)
- user configuration tests (local control)
- network tests (remote maintenance)
- nice tests (via design)
I realize Henry is working on this, but perhaps we could get a shorter-term
improvement in place sooner.
Assigning to 3.1.0 for now since this is accuracy-related. Any fixes should
also be considered for 3.0.x.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
