http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3821
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-26 17:31 ------- I like your idea concerning "harder to defeat" rules. I'd also suggest a classification of "more likely to be correct", which would include - obfuscation rules with ultra high confidence ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - spam headers (X_MESSAGE_INFO) - known forgeries (FAKE_OUTBLAZE_RCVD) - broken ratware (subject =~ /%RAND/) Perhaps such rules can be flagged via tflags or similar mechanism, such that the automatic scoring mechanism will apply preferential treatment to them, provided that the scoring mass-checks hit no ham at all (or no spam if a negative scoring rule). Thus, X_MESSAGE_INFO will be given a higher score than a non-preferential rule with the same hits, because we're more confident in X_MESSAGE_INFO's accuracy. And during the perceptron's scoring adjustments, these rules' scores will be adjusted less than others (because we're more confident they will not cause false positives). ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
