[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> + - MIMEDefang: version 2.42 or later. Michael Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> FWIW, I completely disagree with doing this. A) It will give the > impression that we support these programs (I assume there will > eventually be more), B) How are we verifying that the version listed > actually works? C) Is someone going to test every single release > against each program we have listed to make sure the information is > still valid? D) What criteria are we using to decide which programs > get listed? > > Just my $.02. +0.5 what Michael said. It seems like this belongs on the Wiki, especially since third-party users of SA are going to trail our releases and because it's not our responsibility. Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan ApacheCon! 13-17 November (3 SpamAssassin http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ http://www.apachecon.com/ sessions & more)
