-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Michael Parker writes: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 10:21:06PM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > + - MIMEDefang: version 2.42 or later. > > FWIW, I completely disagree with doing this. A) It will give the > impression that we support these programs (I assume there will > eventually be more), B) How are we verifying that the version listed > actually works? C) Is someone going to test every single release > against each program we have listed to make sure the information is > still valid? D) What criteria are we using to decide which programs > get listed? (A) well, we *do* to a degree [*] (B) what users/devs of those tools report on the list (C) no (D) the volume of traffic from people asking these questions [*]: SpamAssassin is NOT just a mail filter. It's also a suite of perl modules to perform spam identification inside other mail filters. amavisd, MIMEDefang et al are therefore supported products into which SpamAssassin can be plugged. Therefore we have to consider what documentation will help people who use those apps in using SpamAssassin. Having said all that, I'd be +1 on taking that out of UPGRADE, replacing with a pointer to a wiki page which contains that info. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFBWz4wQTcbUG5Y7woRAoq6AKC5uxOr8o6AjxcLZovVxZSPnsUcKgCfcobU XzC6ZAT0rSshWXef5lIjlow= =r7+0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
