http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-18 10:16 -------
Subject: Re: spamd keeps user_prefs between scans with different users
On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 11:07:54PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> but it also needs to be set for $opt{'sql-config'} || $opt{'ldap-config'} as
> well, too, which *can* be enabled without $opt{'user-config'}. See what I
> mean? it's confusing and we're likely to slip up in keeping track of all
> those
> combinations.
If the user isn't allowed to have a config, what do we care about sql or ldap?
In fact, the spamd documentation specifically says that sql and ldap are only
good with -x (aka: nouser-config):
-q, --sql-config Enable SQL config (only useful with -x)
-Q, --setuid-with-sql Enable SQL config (only useful with -x,
enables use of -H)
--ldap-config Enable LDAP config (only useful with -x)
--setuid-with-ldap Enable LDAP config (only useful with -x,
enables use of -a and -H)
> I'd prefer to just have it on, unless max-conn-per-child==1.
That would be the minimal IMO. FWIW, I've been thinking more about
changes I want to make to spamd and the configuration stuff for 3.1,
which would get rid of this whole copying business. ;)
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
