http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3605
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-26 09:14 ------- Why not just add a new config variable to control the addition of the Subject: header when one is missing? rewrite_header Subject [*SPAM*] rewrite_header_add Subject 1 report_safe 0 That way the site admin can control the behaviour of a missing header. Having just upgraded our company from 2.64 to 3.01 last night, I'm already facing this new behaviour if missing subjects and having to explain it. Highly undesireable - if I set that config 'rewrite_header Subject', by god it better get added. Do not try to out-think your site admins, sometimes they know what they want and what their internal users need. ;) Theo - the argument that the user should get a better MUA does not hold water - it's the job of programmers (sic) to make the lives of the end user easier, not the end user pleasing the programmer because of their ideals. At the end of the day, we're trying to catch spam - both technically and from a user perspective. The user won't be giving up their beloved Outlook Expresss (or whatever) to please SpamAssassin, that's for sure. We must adapt to the needs. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
