http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3605
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-26 13:21 ------- Subject: Re: rewrite_header will not rewrite a missing header On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 12:58:11PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > y'see, IMO in this case it's just a kluge when viewed in terms of "code > elegance". it's an extremely nonintuitive misfeature as it stands, and that > needs to be fixed. brokenness > elegance ;) I guess it depends if you think the current behavior is actually broken or not. As far as I'm concerned, the code works 100% as it's designed to do -- there's nothing broken there. The issue at hand is how to go about adding (back) in a feature. That has everything to do with not kluging up the code. Just so we're clear here: I'm not against making the change, I'm against making the change in the wrong way. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
