http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3772
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-07 15:26 ------- I must be missing something. Earlier this year, I was told that SA lacked support for multi-answer DNS queries, which is why we were looking at IADB2 initially and IADB after some code support. But SA 3.1, at least, seems to support multi-answer just fine based on my testing. I drew up rules to support the IADB codes, which tested fine on a mail sender I know is listed in IADB: debug: check: tests=HTML_LINK_IMAGE_BUG,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_WEB_BUGS,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUS TED,T_RCVD_IN_IADB,T_RCVD_IN_IADB2_60,T_RCVD_IN_IADB_BSP,T_RCVD_IN_IADB_LVL10,T_RCVD_IN_I ADB_VOUCHED,WEIRD_PORT Is there something I'm missing? Otherwise I'll consider the issue closed after the rules go into testing. BTW, full IADB testing results, last 60 days of ham: OVERALL% SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME 12279 0 12279 0.000 0.00 0.00 (all messages) 0.423 0.0000 0.4235 0.000 1.00 -1.00 __RCVD_IN_IADB2 0.423 0.0000 0.4235 0.000 1.00 -1.00 __RCVD_IN_IADB 0.423 0.0000 0.4235 0.000 1.00 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB 0.415 0.0000 0.4153 0.000 0.89 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB_VOUCHED 0.269 0.0000 0.2688 0.000 0.78 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB_EPIA 0.220 0.0000 0.2199 0.000 0.67 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB_LVL7 0.212 0.0000 0.2117 0.000 0.56 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB2_40 0.122 0.0000 0.1222 0.000 0.44 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB2_20 0.065 0.0000 0.0652 0.000 0.33 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB_EDDB 0.065 0.0000 0.0652 0.000 0.33 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB_SPF 0.057 0.0000 0.0570 0.000 0.22 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB2_50 0.057 0.0000 0.0570 0.000 0.22 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB_LVL3 0.016 0.0000 0.0163 0.000 0.11 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB2_60 0.016 0.0000 0.0163 0.000 0.11 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB_LVL10 0.016 0.0000 0.0163 0.000 0.11 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB2_30 0.016 0.0000 0.0163 0.000 0.11 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB_BSP 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.00 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB_LVL0 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.00 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB_LVL1 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.00 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB_LVL2 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.00 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB_LVL4 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.00 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB_LVL5 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.00 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB_LVL6 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.00 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB_LVL8 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.00 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB_LVL9 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.00 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB_CID 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.00 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB2_00 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.00 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB2_10 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.00 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB2_70 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.00 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB2_80 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.00 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB2_90 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.00 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB2_100 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.00 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB_LVL100 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.00 -0.01 T_RCVD_IN_IADB_HABEAS ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
