Hello Raymond,
On Friday, January 14, 2005, 1:56:11 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote: > Hi! >>>> Another way to fix the problem would be to rank the domains with some >>>> other source of volume data (not SURBL-related) such as looking at a DNS >>>> cache at a large ISP. >> Not everyone may have been included in an earlier discussion. >> Since SpamAssassin is whitelisting a top 125 of domains and >> not checking them, those 125 tend to be underrepresented in >> the DNS queries. Daniel was interested in finding a more >> representative sample of the whitehat domains to feed back >> into the process to revise the 125. > So we should do some counting again. Thats not a big problem isnt it :) Since SpamAssassin isn't even checking those 125 domains they won't appear in the queries. We can't count what isn't there. ;-) Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
