On Friday, January 14, 2005, 3:01:27 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote: > Hi!
>>>>>> Another way to fix the problem would be to rank the domains with some >>>>>> other source of volume data (not SURBL-related) such as looking at a DNS >>>>>> cache at a large ISP. >>>> Not everyone may have been included in an earlier discussion. >>>> Since SpamAssassin is whitelisting a top 125 of domains and >>>> not checking them, those 125 tend to be underrepresented in >>>> the DNS queries. Daniel was interested in finding a more >>>> representative sample of the whitehat domains to feed back >>>> into the process to revise the 125. >>> So we should do some counting again. Thats not a big problem isnt it :) >> Since SpamAssassin isn't even checking those 125 domains >> they won't appear in the queries. We can't count what >> isn't there. ;-) > Semi, still a lot of people are using SA 2.x with the plugin. > But true, you got qa point there :) Yes, and there are other programs using SURBLs other than SpamAssassin, but it's probably the main one. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
