On Tuesday 22 March 2005 19:15 CET Justin Mason wrote:
> Theo Van Dinter writes:
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 06:00:36AM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > bug 3409: modify header ordering for DomainKeys compatibility, by
> > > placing markup headers at the top of the message
> >
> > Hrm. I don't think we want our headers at the very top, since adding
> > Received headers will get broken up, etc?
>
> that's part of the idea of treating them as possibly "tracking headers".
> in other words a recipient can then see where the X-Spam- headers were
> inserted.
Why do you check against /^Return-[pP]ath:/ instead of /^Return-Path:/i? I
think these headers were case sensitive in RFC 822 but since 2822 all
headers should be matched case insensitive (even if not, we should do so
IMO).
Cheers,
Malte
--
[SGT] Simon G. Tatham: "How to Report Bugs Effectively"
<http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html>
[ESR] Eric S. Raymond: "How To Ask Questions The Smart Way"
<http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html>
