On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 07:56:34PM -1000, Warren Togami wrote: > Theo Van Dinter wrote: > >We really ought to get 3.0.4 out to fix some really annoying issues. > >Still need to get a bunch of patches reviewed. I think these three are > >the main ones we need to get in: > > > >http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4213 > >http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4171 > >http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4338 > >http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4355 > > > >Please review if you have some time. Thanks. :) > > > > Any chance we can rescore for 3.0.4 release?
I'm -1 on this. We are close enough to 3.1 that that would be a pointless waste of time. I'm also (nonbinding) -1 on releasing 3.0.4. Our plan was to focus on getting 3.1 out the door. We eventually decide to get 3.0.3 out the door because distros were asking for it (me included). Now that we're done with that, we really don't need another one. These bugs are relatively minor. Dan was ready to prepare a pre-release for 3.1.0 (until people started checking tons of code in anticipation...) We are close to 3.1.0. We don't need this distraction. Also, if we lasted so long between 3.0.2 and 3.0.3, it doesn't make sense to me why we are releasing 3.0.4 so soon after, given that no bugs were introduced by 3.0.3. All this enthusiasm for the 3.0.x branch seems misplaced. :-) > Would collection of data necessary to rescore 3.0.4 help in the > rescoring of 3.1 too, or is 3.1 too far off at this point? No, it would not help. And it would probably take most of a month. (Although 3.1 scoring shouldn't take as long!?) -- Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
