Duncan Findlay wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 07:49:08AM -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
On the other hand 3.0.4 seems to be *done*. How many bugs fixed now?
Why not release?
Because 3.1.0 is so close and we'll very soon be telling everyone to
upgrade to 3.1.0. Why make them upgrade to 3.0.4 first?
For some upgrading to 3.1.x may never be an option due to policies.
Rescoring a backport maintenance release happened before in 2.64. It
helps to extend the life of the older series.
A good argument against this would be if it takes far too much work. It
is true that I don't know how much work it would entail. If that is the
case, then I would propose scheduling a 3.0.5 with more backported fixes
and rescoring for a few months after 3.1.0. That would give me time to
learn how things work here so I can better contribute time and
especially testing resources.
Warren Togami
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
