http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4469
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 10:10 ------- yes, I agree something like this would be a worthwhile approach. fwiw, I'd prefer to do this entirely inside the Mail::SA modules, however. IMO, we should take the qpsmtpd approach, too, in terms of storage of the full pristine message -- if the size goes over the scanning-size threshold, the remainder of the message data is written to a temp file instead of stored on disk. (we already use temp files anyway in parts of the code.) This would allow us to scan even 100MB mails without breaking a sweat and causing all those FAQs on the users list. ;) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
