http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4394
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX |
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-10 09:30 -------
Hi Bob,
>
> If/when there's a set that has a high enough S/O and high enough spam hit
> ratio,
> then we can open a new bug entry for that submission.
>
> Meanwhile, I find that Tim Jackson's rules file at
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/bogus-virus-warnings.cf works well here.
>
> Perhaps the two of you can work together on this project?
We already do that. If you had a close look at Tims Rules, you may have seen
that this ruleset here is also part of his antivirus rules.
It doesn't make any sense to do mass checks on a ruleset that
is only a subtest. That's why I've requested adding it as __SUBTEST,
which can then be used togeter with other rules.
And yes, these combinations should be tested. SpamAssassin doesn't make
useful combo tests at all - unfortunatly.
The primary target of this ruleset here are 'autoreplies', 'virus bounces',
'spam bounces'.
Martin
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
