On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 06:53:34PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote: > However, our wiki gives no indication either way; Jakarta reportedly > require even more than that (3/4s of the PMC!) so that's no help; > and I can't find any other online doco indicating what the ASF > guidelines are.
Well, the ASF guidelines in general seem to be: the PMC controls the policies of their TLP. So IMO, we should just come up with something that works for us. > So, do we require: > - (a) 3 +1s? seems a bit low, in my opinion > - (b) a majority of the PMC? I think this is most appropriate > - (c) 3/4s of the PMC, Jakarta style? too much. > I'm hoping someone can say "oh yeah, we decided on (b) ages ago!" > here, btw. (a) is 50% of the current PMC (b) is 2/3 of the current PMC (c) is 5 people of the 6 in the PMC So given our current numbers, I think (a) or (b) is appropriate. Moving forward, if the PMC numbers grow, I agree that (a) is too small. I think requiring 1/2 to 2/3 is a good number. BTW, I haven't had the time to read the docs and such regarding the specific details, but I'm +1 on the idea of the subproject. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "I'm never gonna get used to the thirty-first century. Caffeinated bacon? Baconated grapefruit? Admiral Crunch?" -Fry "Well if you don't like that, try some Archduke Chocula." -Leela
pgpmDBAW3O1Do.pgp
Description: PGP signature
