http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4412
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-18 16:41 ------- I initially sided with Sidney, but Mark's statements all make sense to me. We have often had a bit of a thing for premature workarounds; going out of our way to fix stuff that we don't know is actually going to break. So let's go with the improved error reporting, and only later see if there's a problem left that we need to worry about... One thing I'm worried about btw -- the use of AF_INET6 as a bare word. There's a possibility that some platform may not have that defined -- but I cannot think what we can do about that without tying ourselves in knots. Again, let's see if there are any reports of that being a problem, before trying to fix it. (I've left in an explanatory comment just in case.) I'll repackage that patch as against SVN trunk and let's get some votes. I'll also check it into trunk so buildbot can see how we do on the AF_INET6 bareword issue. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
