http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4522
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-12 18:37 ------- -1 The test case you attached with the patch works for me without the patch because the / follows the host name. The example in http://www.rbl.jp/outgoing/jisencodingafteruri does not have a "/" after the URI, so it is working as designed. My MUA, Thunderbird, treats the whole thing as a URI. However, if that example is from real spam and there are MUAs that parse out the non-JIS hostname, then we have to deal with it. If you make it explicit that we want to parse URIs that way by changing the regresssion test to remove the "/" then I'll withdraw the -1 vote. Just to be sure about this: Is it definitely the case that SHIFT-JIS is not allowed inside a domain name? What does IDN allow with respect to non-ASCII characters in a domain name? This fix is only correct if SHIFT-JIS is never allowed in a domain name. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
