http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3109
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-24 14:32 -------
undefined score/required? I really don't like that one, to be honest. The
X-Spam-Status is mainly a UI but also an API, and I think it's better to
"degrade gracefully" for apps that won't know about short-circuiting, by
providing them *something* relatively sane in the areas they're looking
at, instead of breaking their expectations like that.
I do like the "full X-Spam-Level" suggestion though.
To recap, these are the current suggestions:
option (a), Daryl's suggestion:
X-Spam-Level: ******************************************
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score= required= tests=BAYES_50,
HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,SC_TEST
shortcircuit=spam autolearn=no version=3.2.0-r372567
option (b), just the "shortcircuit=spam" thing:
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28,
HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,SC_TEST shortcircuit=spam
autolearn=no version=3.2.0-r372567
option (c), set score to -5 or 15:
X-Spam-Level: ***************
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=15.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28,
HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,SC_TEST shortcircuit=spam
autolearn=no version=3.2.0-r372567
option (d), same as (c) but with a higher value for clarity:
X-Spam-Level: ******************************************
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=100.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28,
HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,SC_TEST shortcircuit=spam
autolearn=no version=3.2.0-r372567
me, I like (d), with (c) as a second-best.
--j.
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-01 15:24 -------
Is this going to be a part of Spamassassin or will we have to keep patching it?
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
