http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3109
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-11 14:57 ------- > Finally, META_TEST_MIN_PRIORITY is rendered obsolete, so it's gone. very nice! > by the way I am still uncomfortable with "shortcircuit default". > I would prefer to get rid of it, since I think it's one feature > too many, unless there's a good reason for it to be kept. > > Dallas, fancy making a case for it? ;) sure, i'll tell you my thoughts behind it. lets say you have the following configuration. identify spam at 5.0 quarantine at 8.0 delete over 15.0 and you have a need to quarantine certain mail, lets say for a past employees. Since you know the To: address, and you know it all needs to be quarntined, the simple solution would be header EX_EMPLOYEES To =~ /(user1|user2|user3)[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ score EX_EMPLOYEES 8.0 shortcircuit EX_EMPLOYEES default priority EX_EMPLOYEES -100 Therefore, any email to those people automatically goes to quarantine because the final score is 8.0. Without being able to shortcircuit and use the default score, you are always going to shortcircuit at the +100 (or whatever leve you set).... which looses flexibility. but its whatever you feel is right... I just thought people may find it beneficial not to designate a spam/ham classification and just use whatever score is assiged to the shortcircuited rule. d ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
