> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 10:23 > To: Chris Santerre > Cc: 'Theo Van Dinter'; [email protected] > Subject: Re: easier rule committing? > > > Chris Santerre writes: > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2006 10:38 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: easier rule committing? > > > > > > - (b) more importantly: is this worth doing? Are we likely > > > to get more > > > > interest in rule development if we do this? > > > > Well besides being low key so I don't go pissing anyone off, yes I > > would be more active directly if it were easier to add > rules. Easy...like SARE easy. > > ;) > > Well, we can't go all the way to how SARE does it. > Unfortunately we are an Apache project, and with that comes > some responsibilities; such as using SVN version control, for example. >
FWIW, we use SVN as our version control mechanism on SARE rules... actually the entire project, website included, in handled through SVN. We promote rules from testing to published manually, but the automated checkouts occur to populate the live rulebase. So, maybe there are other responsibilities that make it not-so-easy for SA, but I guarantee one thing, SARE goes through through the process of masscheck, test, and promote very efficiently. Cya, Dallas
