http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4603





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-08-21 23:27 -------
I'm curious to hear Radoslaw's comments as to why he thinks this is faster than 
running spamd the 
traditional way. What sorts of bottlenecks did this clear? Did we learn 
anything here that could more 
appropriately be applied to spamd instead of relying on apache?

In the test results presented in comment #3 we see that the prefork method was 
more efficient than the 
worker thread. Did you try running spamd with --round-robin to see if similar 
results are found there?

Looking through the RC2 code I'm wondering if you have a short list of things 
you think you'd do 
differently if you felt inclined to rework this.

RE: comment #5. For whatever weight my newbie status carries I think this 
should be a separate 
package at this point. For one it requires a host of new dependencies to run. 
Also, there's simply no 
way it's as stable as it will be in a few months.




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to