http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4603
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-21 23:27 ------- I'm curious to hear Radoslaw's comments as to why he thinks this is faster than running spamd the traditional way. What sorts of bottlenecks did this clear? Did we learn anything here that could more appropriately be applied to spamd instead of relying on apache? In the test results presented in comment #3 we see that the prefork method was more efficient than the worker thread. Did you try running spamd with --round-robin to see if similar results are found there? Looking through the RC2 code I'm wondering if you have a short list of things you think you'd do differently if you felt inclined to rework this. RE: comment #5. For whatever weight my newbie status carries I think this should be a separate package at this point. For one it requires a host of new dependencies to run. Also, there's simply no way it's as stable as it will be in a few months. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
