http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5011
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-08 20:42 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > I profess confusion. Certainly a list like SPEWS introduces considerable false > positives. Moreover, I am getting dramatically different feedback from users. Well, all I can say is that the initial results had lots of ham hits, and this last set of results was worse. So things haven't been improving over the last month since the rules went in for testing. A >10% ham hit rate is absolutely atrocious and completely unusable as a spam detection rule. I'm happy to listen to any ideas you have about improving the results, but as it stands we have no way to use these rules. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
