http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5003
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-14 01:35 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > If they're not exotic, why hide them from RPM with the eval trick? Many systems don't have them by default, but they're not exotic in the sense that they're stable and trivial to install unlike some other modules which are far from a sure bet. (In reply to comment #6) > on the other hand, I can see the usefulness of separating them out; some sites > may want to run the SA engine without updates (with their own rules for > example). > it's like the way you can install perl without perl-doc (on debian-based > systems > at least). Some people may not want to use the rules, but we ship them as part of the main package. I guess I just don't see the benefit in removing a whole 44KB of code from the pacakge. I'm afraid that some distros will omit sa-update from their base install and we'll end up with a whole lot of "what's sa-update, why don't I have it, how do I install it" questions. What's the upside to not including it? The evals are preventing a dependency problem for anyone who doesn't want to use it, right? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
