http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5259
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #3801 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-04 14:37 -------
Created an attachment (id=3813)
--> (http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=3813&action=view)
vetoed code
ok, I've reverted the vetoed code -- this patch is it. have at it ;)
'Hmm... lint error or debug info?
If it's going to a lint error, the lint error message needs to say something
like "you're required to make a determination about 127.0.0.1, either include
127.0.0.1 or !127.0.0.1 (or a larger network that contains 127.0.0.1) in your
config".
If it says "127.0.0.1 is required, add it" people will say the obvious "why
isn't it added by default" and not realize it's not added by default to avoid
doing unexpected things silently.'
lint error. To be honest I can't understand why '!127.0.0.1' would ever be
appropriate...
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
