Bob had a technique that worked reasonably well, and only required some
minor human thought to usually come up with good numbers. I'm pretty sure
that it took overlap into account. (Although the overlap runs may have been
something he did manually, I don't recall.)
He seems to be gone to other places now, but I'm pretty sure he left a
description of how his masscheck and score generation worked someplace
around here, probably in the archives of the newsgroup.
I think it would be worth looking into, since it didn't require much more
than some slightly modified masscheck tools, as best I recall.
Loren
- Re: a way to set scores for new rules in updates Loren Wilton
-