Kevin A. McGrail writes: > > I assumed (good start eh) that there was a *.2.3 wildcard like 3.1 has, so > > a 0.2.3 record would have worked. > > Speaking of wildcards, did a bug ever get opened, closed, worked on to allow > for wildcards in rule names for meta rules? I'd love this feature and my > senility keeps me from remembering where this ended. > > Regards, > KAM
it's bug 5258 -- still in discussion...
