I would vote +1 if it's the last version we *test* with 5.6.1 as a
requirement for release. But I would prefer nothing actively be done to
stop working w/5.6.1. Is there some major feature or anything that is
causing the 5.6.1 concern?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Spamassassin Devel List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: Requirement for perl RFC
Doc Schneider wrote:
I noticed we're now seeing a lot of folks using such an old perl 5.6.1
that maybe we should update our SpamAssassin requirement to use 5.8.0 as
a bare minimum. I know that DBI requires 5.8.0 and states that while it
may or may not build with a lesser version, you can't complain about it
if you're using something that is over 5 yeas old!
Heck I've still got a RH 6.2 sever online and have perl 5.8.x built and
installed on it. 8*)
+1 for marking 3.2.X the last version that we will actively support perl
5.6.1.
Michael
