On Tuesday 02 October 2007 18:47, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Michael Peddemors wrote:
> > On Monday 01 October 2007 13:41, Justin Mason wrote:
> >> I think this is a case where pragmatism may need to be applied. The
> >> thing is, we *could* disable Razor, and later DCC, back then, because
> >> there were alternatives doing more or less the same thing. If we disable
> >> Spamhaus, I think we'd be in a much worse position. :(   They're an
> >> important DNSBL.
> >
> > One other thing to consider in these arguments, is that in most
> > environments where they wish to use Spamhaus data, or any other RBL data
> > for that matter, usually have separate processes to block senders in that
> > space, so it would seem redundant for SA to do a check that in most cases
> > will already have occurred.  And that already allows for the flexibility
> > that various licences dictate.
>
> I don't know that that assumption is reasonable grounds to remove RBLs
> from SA... It may be true in some cases, but it's certainly not all cases.
>
> I, like many others, use absolutely no RBLs to block messages at the MTA
>...
> In fact, problems associated with the whole "block if message meets
> single criteria x" is one of the reasons Justin has mentioned as
> motivating him to create spamassassin in the first place, so expecting
> folks to use such a solution is somewhat contrary to the purpose of
> SpamAssassin.

Understood, however with RBL's that are of a high level of effectiveness, 
there are more and more pressures in real world environments to reduce the 
amount of actual data a server has to process.  If as some of the talk in the 
industry hints at, that there will be legal requirements to track or retain 
email, then such reductions become more and more paramount.  And I do think 
that your particular setup may be in the minority now, and even more so in 
the future, so what I am saying is not to DROP RBL's in SA, but not to 
include certain ones that may be problematic by default.  Make it an option 
to do eg SpamHaus checks, not a default perhaps..

In recent weeks, we have seen the effect of 3 different ISP's whose mail 
services were affected by SpamHaus blocking their DNS Servers, with 
accompanying large increases in local processing times and concurrencies.

And with the current SA, this is more difficult to turn off via a config 
option for example.. 


-- 
--
"Catch the Magic of Linux..."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Peddemors - President/CEO - LinuxMagic
Products, Services, Support and Development
Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca
"LinuxMagic" is a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
604-589-0037 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada

This email and any electronic data contained are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. 
Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely 
those of the author and are not intended to  represent those of the company.

Reply via email to