https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
--- Comment #7 from Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-04-02 16:15:45 PST --- (In reply to comment #6) > I think this might be a common misunderstanding of the use. I'm wondering if > it makes sense to change the default behavior to normally enable '--randomize' > and maybe add a new option of something like '--spamd-hosts-in-order' for the > cases where someone really wants to specify an order to their spamd servers. I'd rather not change the default and then and a new option to get the default back. spamc is old enough that the people who know how it works understand how it works and will be surprised by a a change. The people who don't know how it works will have to figure it out anyway. FWIW, I've setup a lot of MX/spamd farms that specifically rely on the host order not being randomized (first they scan on their local system and then hunt around for a spamd server that is up). I'm not sure if there is a clear cut most common case out there to justify a change of behaviour. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
