https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
--- Comment #8 from Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-04-03 01:44:56 PST --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > I think this might be a common misunderstanding of the use. I'm wondering > > if > > it makes sense to change the default behavior to normally enable > > '--randomize' > > and maybe add a new option of something like '--spamd-hosts-in-order' for > > the > > cases where someone really wants to specify an order to their spamd servers. > > I'd rather not change the default and then and a new option to get the default > back. spamc is old enough that the people who know how it works understand > how > it works and will be surprised by a a change. The people who don't know how > it > works will have to figure it out anyway. I agree. however I'd be happy to apply a patch to the POD docs for -d which explicitly calls out this behaviour, and how to fix it using --randomize... -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
