https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5950
--- Comment #7 from Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-05 05:22:45 PST --- (In reply to comment #6) > Would it make sense for the daemonize function to either add a SIGUSR1 handler > to the parent or create a pipe, have the parent wait for a signal or something > sent over the pipe from the child before it calls exit() and if the daemonize > option is set have the child signal the parent (via kill or writing tothe > pipe) > after it has written the pid to the log file? yes, that would be the ideal fix -- and for that to abort waiting, if the child itself exits. > Perl experts, is there any problem with using a signal or a pipe in this case > and is one better to use than the other? in this setup, either would be fine; signal would be easiest I think. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
