https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5931
--- Comment #5 from Henrik Krohns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-16 23:02:15 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) > I would much prefer that the existing > check be performed until the amount of ranges inputted makes it impractical to > do so (say when 200 ranges are added it skips the O(N^2) bit). +1 from me even if it doesn't count. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
