Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes: > The long standing bottleneck (for net-enabled mass-checks) in my > otherwise fast mass-check cluster is Bind. It seems that it simply > cannot handle the load of a dozen or so cores worth of mass-check > processes. 475 kmsgs/hr non-net versus 70 kmsgs/hr net-enabled is > unacceptable. > > What are people using for a high capacity DNS recursive resolver... > which hopefully includes cache capabilities?
well, I don't have a mass-check cluster ;) What about multiple binds, one per machine? --j.
