https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5983
Karsten Bräckelmann <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME --- Comment #9 from Karsten Bräckelmann <[email protected]> 2009-02-03 17:00:40 PST --- (In reply to comment #6) > I ran the message through your suggested command, and that command gave me > _completely_ different results. I actually don't know how to match one to the > other... :( Yup -- just tested the sample here, too, and I do not see any such wrong hits. The relevant rules triggered here are RDNS_NONE and SUBJECT_NEEDS_ENCODING. Most notably and correctly missing are MISSING_SUBJECT and NO_RECEIVED as reported in attachment 4426. So either (a) your mail processing chain isn't setup correctly, and headers are dropped for scanning or a blank line is injected early, or (b) a mix of CRLF and LF gets in the way (in which case the tool used for extraction of the raw message fixicated it). Either way, works for me, and even works for you when attempting to reproduce. Closing WORKSFORME. TM, if you can reproduce the issue using the command in comment 4, please feel free to re-open this bug and attach a raw sample message that triggers it. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
