On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 21:21, Theo Van Dinter<[email protected]> wrote: > fwiw, the process used to be: > - beta releases to get things stabilized > - use a beta release to do mass-check runs > - generate scores with mass-check data and submit to svn
I think we may be able to simplify that, now that Daryl's system is generating scores weekly... Also one hard part that we need to do is finish the "no rules in main tarball" work item. > - rc releases to get wider testing w/ scores > - release after rc appear to work > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount<[email protected]> wrote: >> --On Wednesday, June 24, 2009 5:28 PM +0200 Mark Martinec >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On my part I've spent less time lately on SpamAssassin then >>> I would like. Getting the amavis release out, preparing for >>> a conference, and then there will be a vacation time for me, >>> so I won't be of much help until the end of July. >>> >>> I wonder if there's anything we could do without too much >>> trouble to let more people start using the 3.3 code from CVS. >>> I suppose there are still nightly tarball builds? (I haven't >>> checked). Perhaps just giving an encouraging hint every now >>> and then on a mailing list could be a good start. >> >> Maybe a public alpha or beta release? So folks know it isn't official, but >> can start testing it out. >> >> --Quanah >> >> -- >> >> Quanah Gibson-Mount >> Principal Software Engineer >> Zimbra, Inc >> -------------------- >> Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration >> > >
