On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 21:37, Justin Mason<[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 21:21, Theo Van Dinter<[email protected]> wrote: >> fwiw, the process used to be: >> - beta releases to get things stabilized >> - use a beta release to do mass-check runs >> - generate scores with mass-check data and submit to svn > > I think we may be able to simplify that, now that Daryl's system is > generating scores weekly... > > Also one hard part that we need to do is finish the "no rules in main > tarball" work item.
which I've just done ;) is there anything else that we should sort out before an alpha is viable? --j. >> - rc releases to get wider testing w/ scores >> - release after rc appear to work >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> --On Wednesday, June 24, 2009 5:28 PM +0200 Mark Martinec >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On my part I've spent less time lately on SpamAssassin then >>>> I would like. Getting the amavis release out, preparing for >>>> a conference, and then there will be a vacation time for me, >>>> so I won't be of much help until the end of July. >>>> >>>> I wonder if there's anything we could do without too much >>>> trouble to let more people start using the 3.3 code from CVS. >>>> I suppose there are still nightly tarball builds? (I haven't >>>> checked). Perhaps just giving an encouraging hint every now >>>> and then on a mailing list could be a good start. >>> >>> Maybe a public alpha or beta release? So folks know it isn't official, but >>> can start testing it out. >>> >>> --Quanah >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Quanah Gibson-Mount >>> Principal Software Engineer >>> Zimbra, Inc >>> -------------------- >>> Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration >>> >> >> >
