Could it be that the comments at the top of the log differ in
mass-check revision number?  could you post those comments?

I can't look right now on the spamassassin2 server to check :(

--j.

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 00:31, Warren Togami <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 09/15/2009 06:00 PM, John Hardin wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Warren Togami wrote:
>>
>>> http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20090915-r815222-n
>>>
>>> Can someone figure out why wt-en4 isn't appearing on ruleqa?
>>>
>>> On previous days wt-en3 disappeared for no reason I am able to ascertain.
>>
>> It might not be done running the masscheck for the 15th yet...?
>>
>> I'm assuming that the ruleqa analysis starts being visible when
>> masscheck starts producing results, and if you keep revisiting the
>> current run while it's still underway, the results will change (e.g. hit
>> rate, S/O, etc.)
>>
>> Am I mistaken?
>>
>
> wt-en4 was uploaded at roughly a similar time as wt-en[1-3] many hours ago,
> but wt-en4 doesn't appear on ruleqa.
>
> The previous two days wt-en3 was uploaded but didn't appear at all.
>
> Warren
>
>



-- 
--j.

Reply via email to